Welcome!




Expand Your Education with These Courses from
Becoming a Successful Sales Professional: Skills for Sales Success: Part One.
Bundle 1: CIPS Core Course (US Version).
Bundle 1: CIPS Core Courses (Non-US Version).
Bundle 2: CIPS Elective Courses (Non-US Version).
Bundle 3: CIPS Institute (US Version).

Costs to Incorporate Green Features

Have a comment on this article? Share on Facebook!

By Robert Dietz

energy_efficient_house_model(1)The cost to make a home green (energy efficiency, water and indoor quality, etc.) is higher than the cost of construction of other homes, and this differential may persist as more builders enter the green market. However, builder experience with green technique reduces cost as engagement in the market increases.

McGraw Hill Construction’s (MHC) data and analytics team surveyed a set of NAHB single-family and multifamily members in 2013. MHC defines a green home as “one that is either built to a recognized green building standard or an energy- and water-efficient home that also addresses indoor air quality and/or resource efficiency.”

According to the findings, the incremental cost for builders to construct green homes was 8 percent in 2013. For remodelers, green projects raised costs by 9 percent on average.

The new home cost incremental was one percentage point higher than determined in the 2011 survey, but lower than the 11 percent increase reported in 2006 and 10 percent in 2008.

McGraw Hill’s analysis found that the cost to build green varied to some degree by the amount of green construction undertaken. For example, single-family builders who reported 30 percent of green projects of total operations indicated that the incremental costs were 5.7 percent on average.  On the other hand, no such scale effects were reported for multifamily developers who on average faced similar incremental costs regardless of the share of green construction.

For remodelers, those businesses that report 30 percent green projects faced an incremental costs of 7.5 percent, compared to 9.5 percent for those doing less than 30 percent green projects.

The survey findings highlight the higher costs of incorporating certain energy-efficient or other green features, which suggests that consumer choice should hold the leading role in determining market share of various green features.

View this original article on the NAHB blog, Eye on Housing.

Want instant access to great articles like this for your blog or newsletter? Check out our 30-day FREE trial of REsource Licensed Real Estate Content Solutions. Need easy stay-in-touch e-Marketing solutions too? Try Pop-a-Note for 99 cents!
Join RISMedia on Twitter and Facebook to connect with us and share your thoughts on this and other topics.




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Copyright© 2014 RISMedia, The Leader in Real Estate Information Systems and Real Estate News. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be republished without permission from RISMedia.

Content on this website is copyrighted and may not be redistributed without express written permission from RISMedia. Access to RISMedia archives and thousands of articles like this, as well as consumer real estate videos, are available through RISMedia's REsource Licensed Content Solutions. Offering the industry’s most comprehensive and affordable content packages. Click here to learn more! http://resource.rismedia.com

Our Latest News >>