<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Northern California Real Estate News - Northern CA and San Francisco Homes for Sale</title>
	<link>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california</link>
	<description>Quality local news and information from a professional California Real Estate Agent. Local real estate news, information and listings for Northern California authored by San Francisco real estate professional Meredith Martin and edited by RISMedia.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.3-2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Trouble with the S&#38;P/Case-Shiller index for San Francisco Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/03/26/san-francisco-real-estate-the-trouble-with-case-shiller/</link>
		<comments>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/03/26/san-francisco-real-estate-the-trouble-with-case-shiller/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meredith Martin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
<category>san francisco real estate case shiller index</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/03/26/san-francisco-real-estate-the-trouble-with-case-shiller/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I woke to the news plastered all across the media outlets&#8230;.San Francisco down 13% according to the well respected Case-Shiller index that tracks re-sales of the same single family home over time.   I must admit, it gave me quite a start and woke me up in a hurry, because either the number they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I woke to the news plastered all across the media outlets&#8230;.San Francisco down 13% according to the well respected Case-Shiller index that tracks re-sales of the same single family home over time.   I must admit, it gave me quite a start and woke me up in a hurry, because either the number they are quoting is WAY off based on my current experience of sales prices in the city, or I am living on another planet.As it happens I am not living on another planet - fortunately for both myself and my clients, and neither is the number off (although I do believe it&#8217;s exceptionally misleading).  The index actually tracks the San Francisco BAY AREA – which constitutes a decidedly different number than if you simply tracked the single family homes in the 7&#215;7 square miles of San Francisco County (which has actually seen a modest appreciation in year over year pricing for single family homes).  In this instance the Case-Shiller index includes Contra Costa county, Fremont, San Mateo, Alameda, Oakland as well as Marin.A little more research into the report uncovers that different price tiers for that same index, reveal very very different price points.  A bit of background to the numbers in the report - which are values created solely for the Case-Shiller report and therefore have no context outside of the index.  They manufacture a number, based on the price of a home’s value in year 2000.  So if a current index value is 150, that would translate into a 50% appreciation in a home’s value since January 2000. Even if we factor in that the depreciation includes the entire Bay Area rather than San Francisco alone – you start to see some stark discrepancies for different price points. The Case-Shiller publishes a separate report that breaks the sales prices into <a href="http://www2.standardandpoors.com/portal/site/sp/en/us/page.article/2,3,4,0,1148448564207.html">three price tiers; a low, mid range, and high</a>. The low range are homes that sold under $545,294 and the value for SF Bay area in Jan 2007 was 269.67 which dropped significantly to 192.12 in Jan 2008 – a 77.55 point decline.  The high range includes single family homes that sold above $794,192 and in January 2007 the index held a value of 182.06 which then dipped to 175.75 in Jan 2008 – only a 6.31 difference. Don’t get me wrong I’m not out to vilify the report.  It is one of the most highly respected reports in real estate, and as such is of value to track broad trends.  However, for San Francisco in particular, a 13% reported decline is very misleading, when in fact the median sales price for single family homes have increased slightly in San Francisco county over last year.Meredith Martin is a life-long Bay Area resident, local author, and has been a Real Estate advisor for over 14 years.  You can find more information about her at www.StreetsOfM.com  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/03/26/san-francisco-real-estate-the-trouble-with-case-shiller/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Francisco Real Estate Up for the year according to Zillow</title>
		<link>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/02/28/san-francisco-real-estate-up-for-the-year-according-to-zillow/</link>
		<comments>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/02/28/san-francisco-real-estate-up-for-the-year-according-to-zillow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meredith Martin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketplace]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/02/28/san-francisco-real-estate-up-for-the-year-according-to-zillow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wont lie, I’m not a fan of Zillow – the reason isn’t because I’m concerned about it replacing agents – it’s more that it can be misleading and often is the source of misinformation because it lacks the ability to discern the subtleties in any market pricing.  I’ve found zillow ‘Zestimates’ that are grossly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wont lie, I’m not a fan of Zillow – the reason isn’t because I’m concerned about it replacing agents – it’s more that it can be misleading and often is the source of misinformation because it lacks the ability to discern the subtleties in any market pricing.  I’ve found zillow ‘Zestimates’ that are grossly (were talking $100’s of thousands of dollars) off actual values.</p>
<p>That being said there are benefits to the kind of raw data Zillow gathers (that excludes nuances) in terms of viewing real estate trends in certain areas.   A recent zip code map released by at <a href="http://www.zillow.com/">www.Zillow.com</a> shows a smorgasbord of good news bad news in the nine county Bay Area region.</p>
<p>At least here in the Bay Area, there are positive numbers, according to the map that Zillow shows, areas such as Detroit have seen only decreases straight across the region.  This &#8220;good news&#8221; shouldn&#8217;t come close to overshadowing the fact that  by large, home values in the Bay Area are down over a year ago - by about 6.7% here in the Bay Area, compared to only a 3% average decrease across the rest of the nation. </p>
<p>Of the nine Bay Area county’s according to Zillow, only San Francisco showed appreciation for the year at a modest 3.7% over the fourth quarter of 2006.</p>
<p>Meredith Martin is a Senior Real Estate Advisor in San Francisco and a regular contributor to several industry publications.  For more information please visit <a href="http://www.streetsofm.com/">www.StreetsOfM.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/02/28/san-francisco-real-estate-up-for-the-year-according-to-zillow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Francisco Real Estate about to become Solar City</title>
		<link>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/02/07/san-francisco-real-estate-about-to-become-solar-city/</link>
		<comments>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/02/07/san-francisco-real-estate-about-to-become-solar-city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 03:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meredith Martin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Marketplace]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
<category>san Francisco real Estate solar</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/02/07/san-francisco-real-estate-about-to-become-solar-city/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Barry Cinnamon, president of the California Solar Energy Industries Association, installing a 3-kilowatt rooftop solar electric system costs $24,000 for the typical homeowner in San Francisco.  However, in January 2008, San Francisco&#8217;s Public Utilities Commission approved a plan to grant big incentives to help homeowners stomach the costs and do something good for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font color="#000080" face="Palatino Linotype">According to Barry Cinnamon, president of the </font><a href="http://www.calseia.org/" title="http://www.calseia.org/"><font face="Palatino Linotype">California Solar Energy Industries Association</font></a><font color="#000080" face="Palatino Linotype">, installing a 3-kilowatt rooftop solar electric system costs $24,000 for the typical homeowner in San Francisco.  However, in January 2008, San Francisco&#8217;s Public Utilities Commission approved a plan to grant big incentives to help homeowners stomach the costs and do something good for the environment. </font><font color="#000080" face="Palatino Linotype"> The </font><a href="http://www.sfgov.org/site/assessor_page.asp?id=72332" title="http://www.sfgov.org/site/assessor_page.asp?id=72332"><font face="Palatino Linotype">plan</font></a><font color="#000080" face="Palatino Linotype">, also known as the &#8220;LARGEST URBAN SOLAR INCENTIVE PROGRAM IN U.S.&#8221;, would grant between $3,000 - $5,000 per private residence, based on whether you utilize a private installer where you are situated in reference to a local power plant; businesses would receive  up to $10,000.  I am still waiting to find out where Home Owner Associations stand within this plan and how they will benefit, one would assume that they would certainly be included.</font><font color="#000080" face="Palatino Linotype">Only one final vote this month is needed by the Board of Supervisors and the plan is expected to go through.  This would cut the cost of installing solar in our residences by nearly half, when you consider the grant proposed by this plan as well as the $7,000 state and $2,000 federal tax rebates!  San Francisco will be the leader in regards to incentives offered by our nation&#8217;s cities.</font></p>
<p><font color="#000080" face="Palatino Linotype">Meredith Martin is a Senior Real Estate Advisor in San Francisco and a regular contributor to several industry publications.  For more information please visit <a href="http://www.streetsofm.com/">www.StreetsOfM.com</a>.  </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/02/07/san-francisco-real-estate-about-to-become-solar-city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pacific Heights San Francisco Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/01/17/pacific-heights-san-francisco-real-estate/</link>
		<comments>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/01/17/pacific-heights-san-francisco-real-estate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meredith Martin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Marketplace]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
<category>Pacific Heights Real Estate Single Family Homes Neighborhood Map</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/01/17/pacific-heights-san-francisco-real-estate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arguably the most famous neighborhood in San Francisco, it can be tough to find a single family home where many deals are made behind the scenes before they ever come to market.  There are currently only 8 active home listings starting in 2008 with a low asking price of $2,700,000 that recently came back to market [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="2" face="Calibri">Arguably the most famous neighborhood in San Francisco, it can be tough to find a single family home where many deals are made behind the scenes before they ever come to market.  </font><font size="2" face="Calibri">There are currently only 8 active home listings starting in 2008 with a low asking price of $2,700,000 that recently came back to market after enjoying being under contract for brief stint of time -  and a high list price of $65,000,000 that has been on the market actively for coming onto 2 years in March.</font><font size="2" face="Calibri"> </font><font size="2" face="Calibri"> <a href="http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/files/2008/01/pac-heights.jpg" title="pac-heights.jpg"><img src="http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/files/2008/01/pac-heights.jpg" alt="pac-heights.jpg" /></a></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Calibri"><font size="2" face="Calibri">I personally think 2612 California our lowest price listing, is cute as a button, but some will be challenged by the uber busy California Street location, a major traffic artery cutting through San Francisco.</font><font size="2" face="Calibri"> </font><font size="2" face="Calibri"> </font></font><font size="2" face="Calibri"><font size="2" face="Calibri">You can find more information about Pacific Heights and recent sales trends at <a href="http://www.meredithmartin.com/map/sfmapinteractive.htm" title="http://www.meredithmartin.com/map/sfmapinteractive.htm"><font color="#800080">http://www.meredithmartin.<a href="http://www.meredithmartin.com/map/sfmapinteractive.htm" title="http://www.meredithmartin.com/map/sfmapinteractive.htm">com/map/sfmapinteractive.htm</a></font></a> Make sure to click on Pacific Heights and the market updates at the bottom of the neighborhood description.</font><font size="2" face="Calibri"><strong> </strong></font><font size="2" face="Calibri"><strong> </strong></font></font></p>
<p><font size="2" face="Calibri"><font size="2" face="Calibri"><font size="2" face="Calibri">Meredith is a Senior Real Estate Advisor working in the San Francisco Bay Area, and is a regular contributor to several real estate publications and news media.   </font><font size="2" color="#0000ff" face="Verdana"> </font></font></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2008/01/17/pacific-heights-san-francisco-real-estate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>November 2007 Average Sales Prices and Days on the Market by San Francisco Neighborhood</title>
		<link>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2007/12/12/november-2007-average-sales-prices-and-days-on-the-market-by-san-francisco-neighborhood/</link>
		<comments>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2007/12/12/november-2007-average-sales-prices-and-days-on-the-market-by-san-francisco-neighborhood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meredith Martin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Marketplace]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
<category>neighborhood map average sales prices days on market multiple listing service districts micromarkets san francisco weather</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2007/12/12/november-2007-average-sales-prices-and-days-on-the-market-by-san-francisco-neighborhood/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Francisco Single Family Home Average Sale Prices by District 
It is often said about San Francisco weather that there are many micro climates within the city&#8217;s 7 square mile boundaries.  Pacific Heights can on any given day be 10 degrees cooler than South of Market.  The same holds true for real estate in this city, just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>San Francisco Single Family Home Average Sale Prices by District </p>
<p>It is often said about San Francisco weather that there are many micro climates within the city&#8217;s 7 square mile boundaries.  Pacific Heights can on any given day be 10 degrees cooler than South of Market.  The same holds true for real estate in this city, just as there are many micro climates, there are also various micro markets where sometimes two short city blocks can make a $100,000 difference in sale price. </p>
<p>The follow is a list of average sales prices sourced by the San Francisco Multiple Listing Service Districts.  To find the correlating neighborhoods by district number, for instance Pacific Heights is within District 7,  go to <a href="http://www.meredithmartin.com/map/sfmapinteractive.htm">http://www.meredithmartin.com/map/sfmapinteractive.htm</a></p>
<p>November 2007:</p>
<ul>
<li>District 1 -<br />
Number of Sales 22 <br />
Average Days on the Market 35 <br />
Median Sales Price $1,260,000</li>
<li>District 2 -<br />
Number of Sales 23 <br />
Average Days on the Market 28 <br />
Median Sales Price $839,300</li>
<li>District 3 -<br />
Number of Sales 15 <br />
Average Days on the Market 43<br />
Median Sales Price $680,000</li>
<li>District 4 -<br />
Number of Sales 18 <br />
Average Days on the Market 41 <br />
Median Sales Price $858,000</li>
<li>District 5 -<br />
Number of Sales 33 <br />
Average Days on the Market 30 <br />
Median Sales Price $1,390,000</li>
<li>District 6 -<br />
Number of Sales 7 <br />
Average Days on the Market 32 <br />
Median Sales Price $1,825,000</li>
<li>District 7 -<br />
Number of Sales 10 <br />
Average Days on the Market 33 <br />
Median Sales Price $2,762,500</li>
<li>District 8 -<br />
Number of Sales 0<br />
Average Days on the Market 0<br />
Median Sales Price 0</li>
<li>District 9 -<br />
Number of Sales 23<br />
Average Days on the Market 35<br />
Median Sales Price $850,000</li>
<li>District 10 -<br />
Number of Sales 24<br />
Average Days on the Market 63<br />
Median Sales Price $608,600</li>
</ul>
<p>November 2007 Condo Data to follow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2007/12/12/november-2007-average-sales-prices-and-days-on-the-market-by-san-francisco-neighborhood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Francisco Real Estate Market &#124; It&#8217;s Still the Exception</title>
		<link>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2007/11/29/san-francisco-real-estate-still-the-exception/</link>
		<comments>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2007/11/29/san-francisco-real-estate-still-the-exception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meredith Martin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Marketplace]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
<category>San Francisco real estate market over asking prices single family homes condominiums multiple listing service</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2007/11/29/san-francisco-real-estate-still-the-exception/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Francisco Real Estate Market &#124; It&#8217;s Still the Exception. 
Sales in San Francisco contiue to defy state and national trends of lowered sale prices.  In San Francisco over the two week period from Wednesday October 24th Through Wednesday November 7th there were a total of  182 properties that sold and changed hands (as per the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>San Francisco Real Estate Market | It&#8217;s Still the Exception.</em></strong> </p>
<p>Sales in San Francisco contiue to defy state and national trends of lowered sale prices.  In San Francisco over the two week period from Wednesday October 24th Through Wednesday November 7th there were a total of  182 properties that sold and changed hands (as per the San Francisco Multiple Listing Service).  The following numbers were taken from the single family homes, condominiums and 2-4 unit buildings only (leaving buisness investments and commercial offerings off the table for now). </p>
<ul>
<li>96 sold over their asking price</li>
<li>54 Sold under their asking price</li>
<li>32 Sold at their asking prices</li>
</ul>
<p>That translates into roughly over half the properties that sold in San Francisco over the most recent two week period sold over their asking price (53% to be exact).  29% sold at it&#8217;s asking price and 18% sold under. </p>
<p>Meredith Martin is a Real Estate Advisory Expert and regular contributer to local publishings in the San Francisco Bay Area.  You can visit her website at <a href="http://www.meredithmartin.com/">www.MeredithMartin.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2007/11/29/san-francisco-real-estate-still-the-exception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABC reports the San Francisco Real Estate News &#124; Is there a Housing Bubble in SF?</title>
		<link>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2007/10/26/housing-bubble-in-san-francisco/</link>
		<comments>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2007/10/26/housing-bubble-in-san-francisco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meredith Martin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Marketplace]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
<category>San Francisco real estate news housing bubble Patrick Killealea ABC Nightline</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2007/10/26/housing-bubble-in-san-francisco/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ABC reports the San Francisco Real Estate News &#124; Is there a Housing Bubble in SF? 
I was recently interviewed for ABC Nightline for a story called Bubble Blogger takes on Housing Market.  Patrick Killealea was the voice of the Bubble Blogger – something he’s turned into his career, and basically his premise is this:  It’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>ABC reports the San Francisco Real Estate News | Is there a Housing Bubble in SF?</em></strong> </p>
<p>I was recently interviewed for ABC Nightline for a story called Bubble Blogger takes on Housing Market.  Patrick Killealea was the voice of the Bubble Blogger – something he’s turned into his career, and basically his premise is this:  It’s cheaper to rent than buy, and you make more money in the stock market than you will by owning your own home.   I ended up on the cutting room floor, due to time in the segment, but the piece - which can be read in the link above - was still interesting.  The argument that it’s cheaper to rent than own is one I’ve read before - the Wall Street Journal did a blog piece on it a while back.  What I found it interesting about that blog was it was written by a person who had a financial stake in making sure people invested in the equity market, rather than the real estate market – but no matter…numbers are number right?</p>
<p>Maybe.</p>
<p>‘According to Ken Rosen, a professor and chairman of the Fisher Center for Real Estate at the<br />
University of California at Berkeley, said Killelea&#8217;s math is wrong. &#8220;The advice not to buy a house is very bad advice.&#8221;</p>
<p>The entire article is published here:</p>
<p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Story?id=3731415&amp;page=3">http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Story?id=3731415&amp;page=3</a></p>
<p><strong>My personal experience on the matter after having sold real estate now for the past 14 years, in which time I’ve seen people both make and lose money in real estate transactions is this:  </strong></p>
<p><strong>1.  If you are looking to flip a property – unless you are an expert and can afford to hold it for a while, it’s probably not a good time to buy.  </strong></p>
<p><strong>2.  If you are looking for a home that you are paying over 50% of your income to keep, you’re probably better off renting until you can raise more down payment.</strong></p>
<p><strong>3.  If however, you are like the vast majority of people who get W2’s in which their home is their primary tax write off, and you can afford the monthly payments…I would start to do my research in the area I was interested in living and seriously look into whether now is a good time to become a homeowner – because inventory in most areas is building – and that means a far more favorable temperature for Buyers.</strong></p>
<p><strong>In San Francisco – we are still seeing properties sell for over their asking prices.  In the past four weeks from September 24<sup>th</sup> – October 16<sup>th</sup> 2007; 275 properties sold per the<br />
San Francisco Multiple Listing Service.  </strong><strong>132 of which sold for over their asking prices, 92 that sold under, and 51 that sold at.  </strong></p>
<p><strong>It’s a city by city, and even neighborhood by neighborhood situation in real estate.  Good to get educated before you decide one way or the other.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2007/10/26/housing-bubble-in-san-francisco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introduction &#124; Meet the RISMedia Local News Author for San Francisco California</title>
		<link>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2007/10/01/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2007/10/01/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketplace]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RISMEDIA, October 1, 2007 — We’re happy to announce Meredith Martin of  M Squared Group and Paragon Real Estate Group as our local author and sponsor for real estate news and information in San Francisco, California. In the coming months she’ll be covering everything from general city news to market trends and conditions.
Meredith brings [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RISMEDIA, October 1, 2007 — We’re happy to announce Meredith Martin of  M Squared Group and Paragon Real Estate Group as our local author and sponsor for <a href="http://meredithmartin.com">real estate news and information in San Francisco, California</a>. In the coming months she’ll be covering everything from general city news to market trends and conditions.</p>
<p>Meredith brings with her a wealth of experience, a sharp eye, and a keen gut instinct with her along with impeccable ethics to every real estate transaction she is a party to.  Naturally a hand holder, she’s also highly competitive and doesn’t like to leave money on the table for her clients if she can help it.  Her primary focus is selling real estate in San Francisco however she also has experience selling in Half Moon Bay, where she grew up, Marin County, where she recently moved after 15 years in San Francisco, and parts of Oakland and Emeryville where she’s represented developers on large multi-unit condominium projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rismedia.com/localnews/san-francisco-california/2007/10/01/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
