RISMEDIA, June 28, 2010—(MCT)—Ending more than two weeks of often-contentious negotiations, House and Senate lawmakers reached agreement on the most far-reaching rewrite of financial rules since the Great Depression.
The final details, including creation of an agency to protect consumers in the financial marketplace and new regulations to reduce risk-taking by large banks and limit their trading of complex derivatives, were hashed out in a marathon 20-hour session.
Lawmakers on a joint conference committee labored until dawn reconciling House and Senate versions of the legislation in time for President Obama to brief foreign leaders on the completed deal at a major economic summit in Canada.
The House and Senate are expected to approve the bill next week, meeting Obama’s July 4 deadline for passage of his top legislative priority heading into November’s midterm elections. Lawmakers christened the bill the Dodd-Frank Act after the two main architects, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher J. Dodd, D-Conn., and House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass.
Speaking before leaving for the summit, Obama praised the “incredibly hard work” of Dodd, Frank and other key supporters of what he called “the toughest financial reform since the ones we created in the aftermath of the Great Depression.”
“Our economic growth and prosperity depend on a strong, robust financial sector, and I will continue to do what I can to foster and support a dynamic private sector,” Obama said on the South Lawn of the White House. “But we’ve all seen what happens when there’s inadequate oversight and insufficient transparency on Wall Street.”
“The reforms making their way through Congress will hold Wall Street accountable so we can help prevent another financial crisis like the one that we’re still recovering from,” he said.
The sweeping legislation—about 2,000 pages long—overhauls the regulatory system in an attempt to prevent a repeat of the financial crisis. Among its major initiatives, it would create a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, impanel a council of regulators to monitor the financial system for major risks, impose tough regulations on complex financial derivatives and grant the government power to seize and dismantle teetering firms whose failure would pose a danger to the economy.
“We’ve done something that’s been badly needed, sorely needed for a long time and we hope will protect our country, create the kinds of jobs and wealth and optimism and trust once again in our financial systems that’s been so missing,” Dodd said after the final vote shortly before 6 a.m. EDT. “It’s a great moment.”
Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said the final bill was strong and “provides crucial momentum for global financial reform.”
“As the president travels to Toronto to attend the G-20 Summit, Congress has shown that America is ready to lead by example,” he said, urging Congress to quickly pass the legislation.
Asked by reporters if the bill could get through the Senate, where four Republicans were crucial to its passage in May, Obama responded, “You bet.”
To pay for the increased oversight of Wall Street and the rest of the industry, lawmakers in their last move on the bill agreed to impose a tax on the largest financial institutions that would raise $19 billion.
“It was the collective errors of the financial industry that led to this set of problems,” Frank said. “We think to go to the Goldman Sachses and the JP Morgan Chases and the Blackstones and other large hedge funds and ask them to collectively make a fairly small contribution is reasonable.”
The levy would be assessed on financial institutions with more than $50 billion in assets and hedge funds with more than $10 billion in assets.
The conference committee’s final vote split along party lines. House members voted 20-11 to approve the revised legislation and senators voted 7-5. Republicans, who sharply criticized the legislation as an unwarranted government intrusion into the private sector, all voted against the final bill, which will be sent to the House and Senate for approval.
House and Senate negotiators made hundreds of changes to the complex legislation since June 10 during a rare public conference committee whose sessions were broadcast live by C-SPAN.
In the final frantic day, lawmakers worked deep into the night as a room full of lobbyists watched the proceedings.
The thorniest issues were left until the end of the negotiations, among them a decision to exempt most auto dealers from oversight by the new consumer agency.
The sticking point on derivatives was a controversial provision that would force banks to spin off their derivatives businesses as part of new regulations of the complex financial instruments. Just after midnight, House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin C. Peterson, D-Minn., announced a compromise. The proposal would limit the types of derivatives banks could trade, including those dealing with interest rates, foreign exchange rates, gold and silver and hedging a bank’s risk.
Other derivatives, including credit default swaps that were at the heart of the financial crisis, could only be traded by a bank affiliate. Banks would have up to two years to spin off those businesses.
The leading proponent, Senate Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., negotiated throughout the day with Peterson, White House officials, centrist Democrats and members of the New York congressional delegation, all of whom have concerns about overly restrictive derivatives regulations.
Members of the conference committee also agreed to a provision known as the Volcker rule, which would limit so-called proprietary trading—investments of the bank’s funds for its own profit instead of for its clients—as well as investments in hedge funds and private equity funds.
The conference committee accepted a proposal by Dodd to strengthen the Volcker rule’s language while also allowing some exceptions. The provision would mandate a ban on risky investments instead of simply allowing regulators to implement such a ban after a study. But it also would allow banks to make small investments in hedge funds and private equity funds, limiting such investments to 3% of a bank’s capital.
The decision to exempt auto dealers from oversight by the new consumer agency was a major loss for the Obama administration. The independent Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which would be housed in the Federal Reserve, is the centerpiece of the sweeping overhaul of financial rules. Along with some key congressional Democrats, the administration pushed hard to have dealer-arranged financing covered by the new agency.
Auto dealers and their allies—Republicans and some Democrats—fought back aggressively. They said the additional oversight wasn’t needed and would raise the prices of cars while hurting the struggling auto industry.
“We concede on our side…that there will be no consumer agency role for autos,” said Frank, who had tried to keep auto dealers under the new agency’s authority.
“Buy here, pay here” auto dealers that lend their own money to customers would be covered by the agency.
But under the legislation, the vast majority of auto dealers would not be covered by the consumer agency if they only arrange loans through banks, credit unions and industry financing companies such as GMAC. The Federal Trade Commission would retain its oversight of auto dealer activities, but would have new powers to enact regulations more quickly.
Democrats from states with a strong auto industry presence joined with Republicans on the committee last year to try to exempt auto dealers from the agency’s oversight.
The White House opposed the exemption, and this year the Pentagon made an unusual public plea to senators to subject the dealers to the bureau’s oversight. Top Defense Department officials said young members of the military often were victims of unscrupulous auto deals.
The Senate never voted on an exemption in their version of the financial reform legislation. But senators voted 60 to 30 to instruct their negotiators on the conference committee to include an exemption. Frank led an attempt to find a compromise that would give the consumer agency some backup authority over auto dealers. But one attempt failed this week, and House negotiators rejected another compromise offered by Dodd.
Some auto industry supporters also objected to the streamlined rule-writing authority for the FTC, where normal procedures can take up to eight years to complete.
“Did they cause the financial instability? No. Are they a part of Wall Street? No,” Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., said of auto dealers. He argued that they were hurt more than any other business sector by the credit crunch. “I really think we’re tightening the screws on an industry that has had a desperate two or three years.”
(c) 2010, Los Angeles Times.
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
