Photo by AJ Canaria

Welcome back! Please enter your password below to log in to your Premier account.
Please enter your email address to log in to your Premier account or to sign up for our free Daily News.
Order Summary
Already have an account? Click here to login
If you already have an account on this site, please login below. Otherwise, please proceed to the Details section.
- Your Order: Subscriber
- Subscription Length: 1 year
- Recurring: Yes
- Content Access: 1 Post, 0 Posts, 0 Pages, 0 Power Brokers
Total: Free
In my opinion, the NAR legal team mishandled a relatively straightforward case. Instead of contesting the lawsuit, they chose a settlement, seeking over 30% from the involved companies, despite claims that a 5-6% realtor commission was already excessive. Contrary to common belief, owners never paid commissions to the selling company. After the lawsuit was filed, the NAR President retired suddenly, and the subsequent search for a replacement, who faced their own challenges, appeared hasty. The organization is now trying to resolve what seems to be a permanent issue, reflecting poor management. Suddenly, there are commercials advocating for Realtors and policies aimed at damage control. The overcomplication is astonishing. Moreover, regarding rentals, legal experts say the lawsuit did not change how rental listings are handled by agents, yet the MLS systems in MD, DC, and VA (BrightMLS) have chosen to eliminate full commission disclosure. This leaves Realtors without a reliable way to disclose referral fees or commissions, pushing them towards verbal cash deal discussions and potentially more lawsuits. The situation was managed terribly.