Welcome!




Expand Your Education with These Courses from
Business Creation - Prospecting: Skills for Sales Success: Part Three.
Effective Presentation Skills for Sales Professionals: Skills for Sales Success: Part Five.
Negotiating Skills: Skills for Sales Success: Part Six.
A Consumer Advocate Approach to Real Estate & Mortgages: Courses 1 & 2.
BPOs: The Agent's Role in the Valuation Process.

Homeowners Outraged Over Cancellation of Their Home Equity Lines

Have a comment on this article? Share on Facebook!

By Sue McAllister and Troy Wolverton

TOP 5 IN REAL ESTATE NETWORK, September, 2009—(MCT)-A growing number of homeowners around the country are finding themselves unable to borrow against the equity in their home, as beleaguered banks take away a financial safety net many homeowners had counted on. And now some of those homeowners are fighting back.

Cupertino, Calif., homeowners Jeff and Jenifer Schulken filed suit this summer against their bank, charging that the bank unfairly terminated their home equity line of credit even though the couple provided documents showing that they could repay the money.

“They weren’t even interested in verifying whether I could pay it back. They just want these things off the books,” Jeff Schulken said, adding he had $160,000 available on his credit line in March when he got a letter from the bank asking for tax documents. He sent them immediately, and was told when he called the bank that the inquiry was only a formality and his equity line was not in jeopardy.

“The next morning, I got online and we had zero available credit,” he said.

In the early part of this decade, home equity lines of credit, or HELOCs, were a regular feature of homeownership. Longtime owners sitting on a few hundred thousand dollars in equity could easily borrow against it to remodel, pay their children’s college tuition or use as a rainy-day fund. But falling property values and the financial meltdown that started last year have led banks to cut off many HELOCs, not letting the homeowner borrow any more money against his or her house.

Attorney Steven Lezell of Chicago law firm KamberEdelson is representing the Schulkens and hopes to gain class-action status for their case and other similar suits. The firm filed a suit against a different bank last month on behalf of an Illinois homeowner who claims the bank used faulty appraisal methods to undervalue his home and freeze his credit line.

Lezell said that following the news of that lawsuit, his firm has fielded at least 500 calls and e-mails from homeowners who may have been similarly affected. Well over half are from California, he said.

Lezell said the banks’ strategies for reducing their exposure to the risk from home equity lines was to “slash and burn, and close as many HELOCs as possible, hope people don’t complain too much and just go away.”

Nationwide, homeowners borrowed $116 billion worth of home equity loans and lines of credit in 2008, down from about $350 billion in 2007, according to Inside Mortgage Finance. California borrowers make up 20 to 25 percent of the market.

Since early 2008, lenders have been methodically suspending many homeowners’ lines of credit for one of two reasons — banks either determined that declining home values made it imprudent to extend the credit to certain homeowners, or they judged that homeowners’ worsened financial situations made them a bad credit risk.

Guy Cecala, publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance Publications, said there’s no data on how many homeowners have had their HELOCs reduced or frozen in the past couple of years. But, he said, “As far as lawsuits, it’s just going to get worse, because there are more people who’ve been impacted.”

The Schulkens got a $250,000 line of credit against their three-bedroom Cupertino house in 2005, used about $123,000 to remodel their home and had paid down the balance to about $90,000 by the time they got the letter from the bank, Jeff Schulken said. Schulken said every month he pays extra on his mortgage and more than the minimum due on the equity line of credit, carries no credit card or other debt, and his income from the family business — a day care run from his home of 21 years — has not faltered during the recession. Having the remaining $160,000 on his line of credit yanked away irked him.

He said he’s not interested in making any money from his lawsuit, but just hopes to make a point. “Bottom line, they weren’t willing to listen or look at any of the facts,” he said. “I feel we were wronged.”

(c) 2009, San Jose Mercury News (San Jose, Calif.).

Want instant access to great articles like this for your blog or newsletter? Check out our 30-day FREE trial of REsource Licensed Real Estate Content Solutions. Need easy stay-in-touch e-Marketing solutions too? Try Pop-a-Note for 99 cents!
Join RISMedia on Twitter and Facebook to connect with us and share your thoughts on this and other topics.




Copyright© 2014 RISMedia, The Leader in Real Estate Information Systems and Real Estate News. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be republished without permission from RISMedia.

Content on this website is copyrighted and may not be redistributed without express written permission from RISMedia. Access to RISMedia archives and thousands of articles like this, as well as consumer real estate videos, are available through RISMedia's REsource Licensed Content Solutions. Offering the industry’s most comprehensive and affordable content packages. Click here to learn more! http://resource.rismedia.com

Our Latest News >>