By Kevin G. Hall Print Article
RISMEDIA, December 29, 2010—(MCT)—The Federal Reserve’s bold but mysterious plan to purchase $600 billion in long-term government bonds through June will be under the microscope in 2011—even if it works—in part because determining that is anything but simple.
The bond-buying plan is an unparalleled effort to spark the economy. It’s called quantitative easing and is intended to lower long-term lending rates. It’s controversial because critics worry that it might lead to inflation that’s hard to quell.
What Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke was trying to do, in part, with quantitative easing was to attack the threat of deflation—a decline in prices across the economy.
By sparking inflation fears, investor expectations shifted from worry that prices would fall into a downward spiral, a specter that can drive investors and consumers to postpone spending as they await lower prices, and thus depress economic growth. Instead, inflation is now seen as the bigger threat, though it has yet to appear.
The distinction is important because inflation, or a rise of prices across the economy, can happen only in an environment of economic growth. Thus a good bit of what the Fed tried to do with its second round of quantitative easing, now dubbed QE2, amounted to psychological warfare on investors and their expectations.
“QE2 is preventing the downside,” said John Silvia, the chief economist for Wells Fargo Securities in Charlotte, N.C. “I think that as I read the commentary, and the presentations by Chairman Bernanke, I kind of get the impression that we’re buying insurance against deflation. When you look at the process, the challenge you see is that a lot of financial institutions, and some consumers, have cash and are not putting it to work.”
Through QE2, the Fed is trying to push investors into taking risks again. Many risk-averse investors have sought the safety of U.S. government bonds, so Bernanke is trying to make that less attractive by pushing up the prices of alternative assets, such as stocks. By purchasing longer-term bonds, the Fed helps lower the interest rate the bonds pay, which makes stocks and corporate bonds more attractive.
The Fed’s hope is that increased investment in stocks and corporate debt will generate a psychological boost that spills over into the broader economy, increasing spending and confidence. Mainstream economists think that QE2 might add half a percentage point of growth to the U.S. economy in 2011.
The Fed may have achieved much of that goal with its Nov. 3 announcement of QE2. The stock market went on a tear, and stocks are on course to finish 2010 with strong gains. Market projections for 2011 are even more upbeat.
Don’t expect the Fed to run any victory laps, however. It has to maintain a poker face while it purchases about $75 billion a month in bonds. “Fundamental to QE2 is that it’s hard to communicate that what you really do want is inflation. You do want assets to go up in price. That’s why they have had a hard time explaining what they’re doing,” said Vincent Reinhart, a former top economist at the Fed and now a researcher at the conservative American Enterprise Institute.
In early December, there was talk that QE2 wasn’t working because the so-called long bond, the 30-year government bond, was paying higher interest rates to investors—the opposite of QE2′s stated aim. Many mortgage rates are pegged to the long bond, so mortgage rates were rising. All of this raised a question: Has QE2 really worked?
“I think to some extent it has,” said Donald Kohn, until recently the Fed’s vice chairman. Kohn, now a scholar at the Brookings Institution, a center-left policy research center, points to Treasury Inflation Protected Securities, bonds whose interest rates are indexed to inflation. The gap between these bonds and conventional ones had been falling, a sign that investors didn’t see inflation on the horizon. Now the gap has come back to more normal levels, suggesting that investors are expecting inflation in the future.
Expectations, however, are changing not only about inflation, but also about economic growth. Since one of the Fed’s two mandates is to promote full employment—the other is to control inflation—expectations are growing that the Fed’s moves will drive down the 9.8% unemployment rate. And that may be beyond the Fed’s ability.
“I think it’s important for the Federal Reserve not to oversell this stuff, and I don’t think they have,” said Kohn. He noted the Fed’s most recent employment projections show little impact on jobs from its bond-buying program.
Few economists expect the jobless rate to fall below 9% in 2011; the Fed itself projects a range between 8.9-9.1%. That’s why Alice Rivlin, a former Fed vice chairman, expects little from QE2. “I think it was conceived as insurance for the recovery,” she said. “I never thought this was going to help a lot; I thought fiscal action was probably more useful. Now that we’ve gotten some fiscal action (with the tax-cut extension package signed by President Barack Obama), it can be regarded as double insurance.”
Rivlin doesn’t buy the idea that rising inflation expectations means that QE2 has already worked. “Is it inflation expectations? Is it worries about budget deficits? Is it expectations that the economy is actually improving? I don’t know,” she said. “I think the big problem is aggregate demand. I think small changes in the interest rate can’t hurt, and I don’t share the view that it is a dangerous thing to do. I don’t think it’s going to be terribly effective in revitalizing the economy.”
The Fed will get blame for failure, but not necessarily credit for success, since Obama’s tax-cut deal includes stimulus measures that politicians will take credit for if they work, including a payroll tax holiday and business-investment incentives.
“I think in the end that will make it difficult to interpret,” Reinhart said. “If the more upbeat forecasts are right…fiscal policy will get the credit.”
However if the economy remains sluggish, the Fed could find itself on the defensive for a policy that didn’t deliver.
“People are going to be looking around in June, saying, ‘Is that all there is?’ I think the general expectation is that is all there is. They got the benefit before they acted,” Reinhart said. “The risk is QE works, but not so well, that it’s difficult to give it credit. You will hear people talk about the Fed being out of ammunition.”
In addition, by next summer, the 2012 presidential campaign will be kicking into gear, and there could be political pressure for even bolder action by the Fed.
“They may have to do it again, but they’re not going to feel good about it,” Reinhart said.
(c) 2010, McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
Visit the McClatchy Washington Bureau on the World Wide Web at www.mcclatchydc.com.
Copyright© 2013 RISMedia, The Leader in Real Estate Information Systems and Real Estate News. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be republished without permission from RISMedia.